AdvertiseDonate
Tuesday, November 3, 2026
What’s happening across America.
Journal Signal · 400 East Pratt Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21202

Latest stories

  1. Breaking: Election Day is here! Make your selections: The fight for the midterms
  2. Learjet 60 Crash in Green Acres: Pilot Reports Ice and Turbulence Before Impact
  3. AMC Tysons Completes Multi-Million Dollar Upgrade With New 4DX Screen
  4. Video shows guard troops aiming guns at dying man in Memphis
  5. Regional Income Gap Leaves Norwich With Lowest Disposable Cash
News · Philadelphia

Judge to Set Trial Date for Lindsay Clancy as Defense Seeks Dismissal

The judge overseeing the triple murder case aims to schedule a second trial soon, but the defense argues the first mistrial was improper.

By Lorenzo Patterson ·

Illustration for: Judge to Set Trial Date for Lindsay Clancy as Defense Seeks Dismissal
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Lindsay Clancy faces a decisive procedural hearing this Monday in Massachusetts. The judge in her triple murder case intends to address the timeline for a second trial. He also plans to rule on whether the case should be dismissed entirely. Clancy was charged in the 2023 deaths of her three children. She entered a not guilty plea.

A jury deadlocked during the initial trial this summer. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial two months later. He has stated his goal is to move the case forward quickly without compromising legal rights. Sullivan said he does not want the case to be delayed indefinitely.

Clancy’s lawyers argue the judge should dismiss the charges. They claim the court failed to properly investigate the juror who blocked a conviction. Attorneys Martin Weinberg and Kevin Reddington contend that retrying the case would violate double jeopardy protections. They assert there was no need to declare a mistrial in the first instance.

Prosecutors from the Plymouth County District Attorney’s Office disagree. They state the judge properly declared a mistrial after the jury reported being deadlocked twice. They argue further investigation into the dissenting juror would have intruded on private deliberations. The holdout juror, identified as Michael Péguy Desronvil, said he had no doubts about Clancy’s guilt. He described her actions as methodical and logical.

The court will also consider a request for a gag order. Prosecutors seek the order to prevent what they call a carnival atmosphere from the first trial. They argue it will protect the integrity of the judicial system and prevent future juries from being influenced. Defense attorney Laura McConnell pushed back against the request. She stated the concerns were speculative because no jury has been selected yet. She noted there is no evidence that prospective jurors have been affected by previous statements.

Both sides have told the judge they prefer to wait on a trial date until post-trial motions are resolved. Defense lawyer Kevin Reddington said they would rather defer a new date until rulings are made and appellate arguments are presented. District Attorney Timothy Cruz said his office is currently evaluating whether to retry the case. He said they are conducting a thorough review to ensure the outcome serves the interests of justice and the three children.

Source: WPVI-TV

More News · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Journal Signal in your inboxWhat’s happening across America. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Journal Signal in your inboxWhat’s happening across America. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.