AdvertiseDonate
Sunday, November 15, 2026
What’s happening across America.
Journal Signal · 400 East Pratt Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21202

Latest stories

  1. High stakes art auctions test collector confidence with $180 million Van Gogh
  2. Two Reported Killed in Northern Gaza Drone Strike as Israel Says It Targeted Terror Operatives
  3. Woman Killed, Three Hurt as Grenade Thrown at Pastry Shop in Northern Town of Kafr Manda
  4. Week 11 College Football Schedule Features High-Stakes Conference Showdowns
  5. Golden Rooster Festival Highlights Chinese Film Success and Debate Over AI
News · Fairfax

Voters in Montgomery County face $50 trash fee hike under either waste plan

Council members are set to decide Tuesday between keeping the aging Dickerson facility or shipping waste to out-of-county landfills.

By Lorenzo Patterson ·

Illustration for: Voters in Montgomery County face $50 trash fee hike under either waste plan
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

Montgomery County residents will likely pay roughly $50 more for trash service no matter which waste management path their leaders choose Tuesday.

The county council is expected to vote on whether to maintain the Dickerson Resource Recovery Facility or close it and transport solid waste to landfills in neighboring jurisdictions.

The incinerator, which began operations in 1995, requires substantial funding for upkeep and technological upgrades. Previous county reviews estimated that keeping the site running with modern equipment could cost up to $356 million.

County Executive Marc Elrich has advocated for shutting down the facility. He pointed to environmental and equity issues related to ash disposal, specifically the need to find a new storage site that does not burden lower-income or minority communities. Elrich has pushed for expanded recycling and composting as alternatives to incineration.

In a letter to council members last week, Elrich suggested studying waste reduction technologies used in San Jose, California, if the council opts against an immediate closure. This recommendation follows review sessions held by the council in September and October.

The final decision rests with the council, which will weigh the financial burden of maintenance against the costs of hauling waste out of the county.

More News · Report a business · Got a Story?

Get Journal Signal in your inboxWhat’s happening across America. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Related stories

Get Journal Signal in your inboxWhat’s happening across America. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.